in theory it’s opportunity but as I’ve seen and experienced it’s not going to happen without a complete restart of our society we as a people have limited others to who they are where they came from and who their parents are. Outcome is questionable because then you dip into I worked me butt off to get where I am and now I have to give what I worked hard for to someone that slacked off and didn’t want to do anything to get anything. It’s like comparing a rural community to an urban community different opportunities the urban communities tend to have more jobs with the potential for a better opportunity and then the schools get more funding but the school have a higher population of students where the rural communities have less jobs that have potential for a better opportunity and lower funded but have a smaller student population. But with how things that I’ve noticed lately it seems that they have put an importance on the outcome with how people seem to be jumping on certain bandwagons without knowing the history of what else happens.
@Wesley Trueblood III i don’t think we can without going to a Marxist co-ownership society. The only real way to address it is to put more value on our own personal choices and less on the actions of the people that are considered slackers by expecting everyone else to make up for their decision to do as little as possible and expect to get the samething as the person next door. It’s a personal accountability issue that affects the outcome.
in theory it’s opportunity but as I’ve seen and experienced it’s not going to happen without a complete restart of our society we as a people have limited others to who they are where they came from and who their parents are. Outcome is questionable because then you dip into I worked me butt off to get where I am and now I have to give what I worked hard for to someone that slacked off and didn’t want to do anything to get anything. It’s like comparing a rural community to an urban community different opportunities the urban communities tend to have more jobs with the potential for a better opportunity and then the schools get more funding but the school have a higher population of students where the rural communities have less jobs that have potential for a better opportunity and lower funded but have a smaller student population. But with how things that I’ve noticed lately it seems that they have put an importance on the outcome with how people seem to be jumping on certain bandwagons without knowing the history of what else happens.
Opportunity. Among other reasons, it's much more realistically achievable than outcome.